Next: Producing your own Up: Fine tuning of Previous: Consistent heat/fresh water

Constrained fluxes in UWM/ COADS

The individual heat flux components, evaporation and precipitation provided in UWM/COADS are not tuned in any way. It is left to the user to choose a particular set of tuning parameters most suitable to the application at hand; section 9.6 discusses the necessary steps to produce fine tuned fluxes. However, the net heat flux, buoyancy flux, and evaporation minus precipitation fields included in the data set have been constrained using the global balance requirement given in the first row of Table 13. Figure 9 depicts the annual mean constrained net heat flux included in UWM/COADS which should be compared with the unconstrained net heat flux in Fig. 8. As required by the requirement of zero transport at 65° S, the constrained net heat flux now satisfies the consistency condition (44) when the ocean region between 65° N and 65° S is considered. As we have neglected to tune those regions poleward of 65°, an imbalance of PW remains in the constrained net heat flux when we consider the entire global ocean.

The corresponding constrained zonally integrated meridional heat transport for each ocean is shown in Fig. 10, along with several oceanographic measurements in the Atlantic. In agreement with previous studies, our estimate produces a northward transport throughout the Atlantic and a southward transport in the Indian ocean. Our estimate for the southward transport in the South Pacific is somewhat smaller than previous estimates by Hsiung (1985) and Hastenrath (1982). In the Atlantic our estimate is within the error bars for Wunsch's (1984) determination at the equator and Hall and Bryden's (1982) value at 25° N. Our estimated Atlantic heat transport at 32° N is about half the value obtained by Rago and Rossby (1987) who admit their estimate is rather large. In fact, imposing the Rago and Rossby (1987) value as a single-constraint the solution of the inverse calculation violates the consistency condition (57). Similar difficulties were reported by Isemer et al. (1989).

The zonally integrated meridional fresh water transport is depicted in Fig. 11 for each ocean. For the Atlantic, our estimate is somewhat smaller than Schmitt et al.'s (1989) in the tropics, which is based on Bunker's (1976) estimate of evaporation. At 25° N our estimate gives a southward transport of Sv which is larger than Hall and Bryden's (1982) value of Sv, but conceivably within their error bar.

While the results above suggest that our choice of tuning parameters based on requirement of global balance (first row of Table 13) produces reasonable estimates of heat and fresh water fluxes, it is important to keep in mind that this choice is very likely non-optimal for specific applications. We strongly encourage users to experiment with other choices of parameters.



Next: Producing your own Up: Fine tuning of Previous: Consistent heat/fresh water


Fri Oct 20 12:28:33 EDT 1995